COMPARISON 2026
VS

An always-on evidence system or an external consultancy per project? We compare Centivence with traditional consultancies so you pick the right fit for your Medical, Market Access and Marketing teams.

Personalized demo · no commitment · in your own context

Advantages over consultancies

4 reasons to choose Centivence.

  • Always-on, not project by project
  • Continuous 24/7 monitoring
  • Scales at no marginal cost
  • Your evidence, centralized and reusable
+ EVERY ANSWER WITH A VERIFIABLE CITATION

Centivence vs traditional consultancies: full analysis

Traditional consultancies deliver bespoke evidence, market access and strategy work through expert human teams. They bring deep domain knowledge and tailor each engagement to your brand — but on a per-project basis, with lead times of weeks and a cost that scales with every new question.

Centivence takes a different approach: it’s an always-on agentic evidence system. Instead of commissioning a new project each time, it continuously monitors the literature, competitors and regulatory landscape, reasons only over your validated evidence, and turns it into strategy — instantly, at no marginal cost, and always with a verifiable citation.

In this comparison we analyse both options so you can decide which one fits your way of working, your budget model and the real needs of your Medical, Market Access and Marketing teams.

Detailed comparison

Feature CENTIVENCE EVIDENCE OS CONSULTANCIES
NATURE
Category Agentic evidence system Human service
Purpose Evidence → strategy Bespoke project work
Runs continuously Per project
EVIDENCE & MONITORING
Literature search Structured, source-tracked Manual
Competitor monitoring One-off
Own evidence repository
ANSWERS & RIGOR
Verifiable citations
Reasons only over validated evidence Manual
Automatic impact reports Manual
CONTEXT & FIT
Pharma focus (MA / MAx / MKT)
Adapts to your portfolio & competitors
Team collaboration
COST & SPEED
Time to result Continuous, in background Weeks
Scales at no marginal cost

Use cases: when to use each one?

Ideal cases for Centivence

Manager running a product portfolio

Centivence continuously monitors the scientific evidence, competitors and regulatory landscape around your product, and turns it into value messages ready for your strategy. Stop chasing papers and decide with data.

Evidence-led product management

Director who wants the full picture

All of your team’s knowledge — validated evidence, analysis and decisions — stays centralized in a single repository. See the real status of every product without depending on who holds the information.

Centralized knowledge

Junior analyzing data every day

Centivence’s agents search, filter and synthesize the literature for you, always with a verifiable citation. Hours of manual work shrink to minutes, so you focus on the analysis, not the searching.

Save hours of manual work

Ideal cases for consultancies

You need deep, bespoke analysis

Consultancies bring senior experts who tailor a study to a specific, one-off strategic question with full human judgment.

Bespoke expertise

You need independent validation

A third-party report can add external credibility for boards, payers or regulators on a high-stakes decision.

Independent credibility

You have a one-off, complex project

For a large, non-recurring piece of work, a dedicated consulting team can own it end to end.

One-off projects

Centivence

ADVANTAGES
  • Always-on, not project by project
  • Continuous 24/7 monitoring of competitors & regulatory
  • Scales at no marginal cost
  • Results in hours, not weeks
  • A living evidence repository you own
DISADVANTAGES
  • Not a substitute for bespoke human consulting
  • Needs onboarding with your portfolio & context
  • Less suited to one-off, highly custom studies

Consultancies

ADVANTAGES
  • Deep human expertise & judgment
  • Fully tailored to your brand
  • Independent, third-party credibility
  • Handles complex, bespoke projects
  • Pharma & market-access know-how
DISADVANTAGES
  • Per project, not always-on
  • Slow — weeks to results
  • Expensive and doesn’t scale
  • Knowledge leaves when the project ends
  • No living evidence repository

Which one to choose?

No fluff. An honest recommendation based on what you actually need.

“THE SAFE BET”

Choose Centivence if:

  • You need evidence intelligence ongoing always-on, not per project
  • You need continuous monitoring competitors & regulatory, 24/7
  • You want results in hours not weeks
  • You want your evidence centralized a repository you own
“IF YOU FIT BETTER HERE”

Choose consultancies if:

  • You have a one-off strategic project non-recurring
  • You need bespoke human analysis senior experts
  • You want third-party validation independent credibility
  • Your budget is per project not ongoing

Stop managing evidence.
Start using it.

See how Centivence gives your Medical Affairs, Marketing, and Market Access teams a single system to find, organise, and act on scientific evidence.

Book a demo